Pc1d tutorial paper
A "complicating your claim" conclusion for this paper might provide historical evidence that Ireland did aid the Allies, suggesting that the Irish were more influenced by international diplomacy than their formal neutrality might suggest. This paper argues that Ireland refused to enter the war because it wanted to assert its sovereignty, not because it had no opinion about the conflict. Such additional resources could include a new outside source or textual evidence that seemingly contradicts your argument.įor example, consider a paper about Ireland's neutrality during World War II. When you use the "complicating your claim" strategy to write your conclusion, you are using one or more additional resources to develop a more nuanced final thesis. To use this strategy, ask yourself, "What is an overall theme of this course? How does my paper's thesis connect?" The "Complicating Your Claim" Strategy A "connecting to a course theme" conclusion for this paper might propose that Welty's daughter characters demonstrate what type of people can and cannot escape the South. When you use the "connecting to a course theme" strategy to write your conclusion, you are establishing a connection between your paper's thesis and a larger theme or idea from the course for which you are writing your paper.įor example, consider a paper about mothers and daughters in Eudora Welty's Delta Wedding for a class called "The Inescapable South." This paper argues that a strong dependence on the mother is analogous to a strong dependence on the South. To use this strategy, ask yourself, "How does my argument affect how I approach the text or issue?" The "Connecting to a Course Theme" Strategy If the paper argues that alcohol abuse among students depends more on psychological factors than simply the availability of alcohol on campus, a "so what?" conclusion might tie together threads from the body of the paper to suggest that universities are not approaching alcohol education from the most effective perspective when they focus exclusively on limiting students' access to alcohol. This strategy allows you to leave readers with an understanding of why your argument is important in a broader context or how it can apply to a larger concept.įor example, consider a paper about alcohol abuse in universities. When you use the "so what?" strategy to write your conclusion, you are considering what some of the implications of your argument might be beyond the points already made in your paper. Part of generating a thesis statement sometimes requires answering the "so what?" question-that is, explaining the significance of your basic assertion. Whether your paper is meant to be formal or informalĬhoose a strategy that best maintains the flow and tone of your paper while allowing you to adequately tie together all aspects of your paper.The tone of your paper (whether your paper is analytical, argumentative, explanatory, etc.).The conventions of the discipline in which you are writing.The strategy you employ in writing a conclusion for your paper may depend upon a number of factors: Address the limitations of your argument.Pose a new research question as a result of your paper's findings.Complicate your claim with an outside source.Connect to a larger theme from the course.You can employ one of several strategies for taking your conclusion that important step further: Your conclusion should offer the reader something new to think about-or, at the very least, it should offer the reader a new way of thinking about what you have said in your paper. Make sure that you are not simply repeating yourself your restated thesis should use new and interesting language.Īfter you have restated your thesis, you should not just summarize the key points of your argument. Restating your thesis is just a short first part of your conclusion. It is often helpful to restate your argument in the conclusion, particularly in a longer paper, but most professors and instructors want students to go beyond simply repeating what they have already said. In the past, you may have been told that your conclusion should summarize what you have already said by restating your thesis and main points. In other words, the end of your paper is a place to look outward or ahead in order to explain why you made the points you did. Though expectations vary from one discipline to the next, the conclusion of your paper is generally a place to explore the implications of your topic or argument.